Court Ruling May End Free Online Music Party
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Flaws in the Efficiency Gap
Gerrymandering is returning to the Supreme Court. For the first time in three decades, a federal court invalidated redistricting legislation on the grounds that it constituted a partisan gerrymander in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. That court relied, in part, on a new tool—the efficiency gap—which some have touted as the means to “end gerrymandering once and for all.” We evaluate this ...
متن کاملSignaling, Learning and Screening Prior to Trial: A Theory of Preliminary Injunctions∗
The decision to request a preliminary injunction—a court order that bans a party from certain behavior until its lawfulness is ascertained in a final court ruling at trial—is an important litigation instrument in many areas of the law including antitrust, copyright, patents, trademarks, employment and labor relations as well as contracts. The process of filing for a preliminary injunction and t...
متن کاملClearing the air: what the latest Supreme Court decision regarding medical marijuana really means.
handed down its 6-3 decision against Angel Raich and Diane Monson.1 The Court ruled that the federal government can prohibit even intrastate and noncommercial marijuana possession and cultivation under the rubric of “interstate commerce.” In the prior Supreme Court ruling, United States vs. the Oakland Cannabis Buyers’ Cooperative,2 the Court ruled that “medical necessity” is not a legal defens...
متن کاملDavis v. Davis (1992)
In Davis v. Davis (1992), the Supreme Court of Tennessee decided a dispute over cryopreserved preembryos in favor of Junior Lewis Davis, who sought to have the preembryos destroyed over the objections of his former wife, Mary Sue Davis. The decision in Davis, although not binding in other states, suggested a framework for resolving similar disputes in the US. That framework established that cou...
متن کاملدخالت دادگاهها در رسیدگیهای داوری در حقوق ایران
In case of existing a reliable agreement the courts do not have jurisdiction to consider the settlement of the case. So, the effect of arbitration agreement is to exclude the jurisdiction of state courts. The exclusion of court jurisdiction is not meant the absolute non-intervention in arbitration proceedings. Arbitration may not exist without a degree of court intervention. But, this interve...
متن کامل